Roma Uomo

I'm intrigued by the debate around the unisex nature of this perfume. Some users have mentioned that it's suitable for both men and women, but the title explicitly states "For Men". As someone who wants to gift this fragrance to a wife who prefers feminine scents, I'm curious to know if this perfume can be classified as truly unisex. Given my wife's cultural background and preferences, she would likely prefer a scent marketed towards her gender rather than one intended for men. If the majority of users consider it unisex, perhaps the title should be revised to reflect this.

Tried this perfume this morning, leaving me with mixed emotions: the initial scent is delightfully pleasant and warm, boasting rich citrus notes that unfold smoothly. However, the fragrance undergoes a transformation, evolving into a more intricate composition featuring floral nuances, albeit less potent than I had anticipated. The drydown settles closely to the skin, which is a shame - the sandalwood present here is truly lovely. I experienced moderate longevity and was let down by the lack of projection. Perhaps this is an issue with my personal body chemistry, but for now, I'll opt for another fragrance that resonates more with me.

This scent has a refined, luxurious quality reminiscent of upscale fabric softeners, with a silky texture that glides effortlessly across the skin.

When I think back to my experience with this perfume from 10 years ago, it's essential to consider the possibility that changes may have been made since then. Nevertheless, in my opinion, this scent doesn't strike me as overwhelmingly fruity or citrusy; instead, it reminds me of savoring a juicy orange slice on a warm summer afternoon while taking in the fresh air. It's a delightful combination of freshness, sweetness, and naturalness that feels like a royal treat. I'd give it a rating of 9 out of 10.

The longevity leaves something to be desired, prompting me to opt for a larger 200ml size to ensure I can fully appreciate the scent during multiple uses.