Armani Code Colonia

I've been wearing the Armani Code flanker lately, and while it's not exactly the same as the original, it's still a pleasant experience. I got to wear it on a few occasions last fall when I picked up a sample, and it reminded me of the memories I have from when I first fell in love with Armani Code years ago—tonka bean, citrus, and a subtle woody, smoky sweetness that really sticks with you. The flanker version has a bit more citrus and some pepper notes that give it a sharper edge, but it's not too overwhelming. There's a faint bitterness, though it's really minimal, which I think is just part of the overall balance. Overall, it's a decent flanker, but I don't see a huge difference from the original. Honestly, Colonia and the classic Armani Code are so similar that most people might struggle to tell them apart. I'd give it about 7.5 out of 10—maybe even an 8 if I consider my love for the original. It's light and semi-sweet, but as a flanker, I wish it had more of its own unique character.

It's a pleasant scent despite some opinions that compare it to other fragrances. This flanker falls between Code Profumo and Code Absolu, blending notes like mandarin, orange blossom, and tonka beans but seeming less rich because it's an EDT instead of the original EDPs. The opening is bold, with spicy notes of pepper and bergamot, then it transitions to a more mature, masculine aroma after a couple of hours. By hour six, it’s hard to detect, though in hour three it was still noticeable as a skin scent. If you prefer EDTs for everyday use, this could be a good option. It's reminiscent of summer versions of Profumo and Absolu, with strong sillage that fades quickly—like a lighter, summery take on those perfumes.

I've got to say, I really like this fragrance. While I don't agree with all the negative comments I've seen about its longevity, my experience has been quite different. One spray on me lasted well over five hours, and even after a shower, I could still detect it. The quality of the fragrance oil feels really solid. It's discontinued, so I bought multiple 4-ounce bottles from a trusted source. The scent is simple but effective, reminiscent of many musky fragrances but with a unique twist. As someone who usually goes for sweeter smells, this one definitely stood out. If you can find it at a reasonable price, I'd recommend giving it a try.

"It's pretty good, but there's just one thing holding me back from loving it. It's super sweet—so sweet it almost feels overwhelming. Compared to the original Code, this one feels more like a 'sweet citrus' twist instead of the fresh kick I loved in the original. It lasts a while, though, and the projection is solid. But honestly, I still think the OG Code is better because it has that fresh element I can't get enough of. This version lacks some depth—no spice or leather notes here, which makes it feel a bit one-dimensional. Too sweet for a summer cologne—it needs more freshness or bitterness to balance it out. The citrusy, slightly aquatic vibe is there, but the heavy sweetness just overshadows everything, making it feel flat and not as complex as I'd like. Overall, it's just not hitting that Armani mark they're known for. And honestly, I can't help but compare it to the original scents, which gave me this fresh, almost schoolboyish vibe. This version feels a bit generic in comparison."

Same Coda DNA, but it feels boring to me. The top notes have that warm tonka and a good amount of citrus, giving it an effervescent vibe. I definitely notice the amyl salicylate, which reminds me of banana. It's a weak performer on me, especially since it starts quite heavy. It feels a bit dated, though maybe I'm just over it. Not my favorite, or really any in the Code line, but if you're looking for something generic and versatile, it might work as a decent men's cologne.